[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86: work around clang IAS bug referencing __force_order
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 12:26 PM Segher Boessenkool
<> wrote:
> [ There is GCC 4.9.4, no one should use an older 4.9. ]
> I mentioned 5 for a reason: the whole function this patch is to did not
> exist before then! That does not mean the bug existed or did not exist
> before GCC 5, but it does for example mean that a backport to 4.9 or
> older isn't trivial at all.
> > I am asking myself who is using such ancient compilers?
> Some distros have a GCC 4.8 as system compiler. We allow building GCC
> itself with a compiler that far back, for various reasons as well (and
> this is very sharp already, the last mainline GCC 4.8 release is from
> June 2015, not all that long ago at all).
> But, one reason this works is because people actually test it. Does
> anyone actually test the kernel with old compilers? It isn't hard to
> build a new compiler (because we make sure building a newer compiler
> works with older compilers, etc. :-) ), and as you say, most distros
> have newer compilers available nowadays.

We only recently changed the minimum from 4.6 to 4.8, and
subsequently to 4.9. Most people have fairly recent compilers,
but there are a number of notable kernel developers that
intentionally stick to old versions because of compile speed.

Each major compiler release adds about 4% overhead in total time
to compile a kernel, so between gcc-4.6 and gcc-11 you add over
50% in build time.


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-22 12:36    [W:0.104 / U:1.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site