lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Aug]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC-PATCH 1/2] mm: Add __GFP_NO_LOCKS flag
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 03:27:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> And guarding it with RT is not working either because then you are back
> to square one with the problem which triggered the discussion in the
> first place:
>
> raw_spin_lock()
> alloc()
> if (RT && !preemptible()) <- False because RT == false
> goto bail;
>
> spin_lock(&zone->lock) --> LOCKDEP complains
>
> So either you convince Paul not to do that or you need to do something
> like I suggested in my other reply.

I'd like to throw in the possibility that we do something like:

raw_spin_lock()
alloc()
if (!spin_trylock(&zone->lock))
if (RT && !preemptible())
goto bail;
spin_lock(&zone->lock);

would that make us feel more comfortable about converting zone->lock to
a raw spinlock?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-08-13 16:33    [W:0.098 / U:0.244 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site