Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | Tyler Hicks <> | Subject | [PATCH v3 11/12] ima: Use the common function to detect LSM conditionals in a rule | Date | Thu, 9 Jul 2020 01:19:10 -0500 |
| |
Make broader use of ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond() to check if a given rule contains an LSM conditional. This is a code cleanup and has no user-facing change.
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> ---
* v3 - No change * v2 - No change
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 11 ++--------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index c4d0a0c1f896..81ee8fd1d83a 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -360,17 +360,10 @@ static bool ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(struct ima_rule_entry *entry) static void ima_lsm_update_rules(void) { struct ima_rule_entry *entry, *e; - int i, result, needs_update; + int result; list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, e, &ima_policy_rules, list) { - needs_update = 0; - for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) { - if (entry->lsm[i].args_p) { - needs_update = 1; - break; - } - } - if (!needs_update) + if (!ima_rule_contains_lsm_cond(entry)) continue; result = ima_lsm_update_rule(entry); -- 2.25.1
|  |