lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 14/16] irq: Add support for core-wide protection of IRQ and softirq
Date
"Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com> writes:
> On 2020/7/1 5:32, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
>
> We saw a lot of soft lockups on the screen when we tested v6.
>
> [ 186.527883] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#86 stuck for 22s! [uperf:5551]
> [ 186.535884] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#87 stuck for 22s! [uperf:5444]
> [ 186.555883] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#89 stuck for 22s! [uperf:5547]
> [ 187.547884] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
> [ 187.553760] rcu: 40-....: (14997 ticks this GP) idle=49a/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=1711/1711 fqs=7279
> [ 187.564685] NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 14
> [ 187.564723] NMI watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 38
>
> The problem is gone when we reverted this patch. We are running multiple
> uperf threads(equal to cpu number) in a cgroup with coresched enabled.
> This is 100% reproducible on our side.

ROTFL. I just predicted that from staring at the patch ....

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-18 01:38    [W:0.184 / U:1.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site