[lkml]   [2020]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: leds: pca955x: Add IBM implementation compatible string

> IBM created an implementation of the PCA9552 on a PIC16F
> microcontroller. Document the new compatible string for this device.

Is the implementation opensource?

> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <>

> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-pca955x.txt
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Required properties:
> "nxp,pca9550"
> "nxp,pca9551"
> "nxp,pca9552"
> + "nxp,pca9552-ibm"
> "nxp,pca9553"

Is it good idea to use nxp prefix for something that is
software-defined and not built by nxp?

Would ibm,pca9552 be better, or maybe even sw,pca9552 to indicate that
is not real hardware, but software emulation?

Best regards,
(cesky, pictures)
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-07-11 15:49    [W:0.056 / U:1.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site