lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC,net-next, 2/5] vrf: track associations between VRF devices and tables
On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 18:34:25 -0600
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/13/20 4:53 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> > Hi Stephen,
> > thanks for your questions.
> >
> > On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:28:59 -0700
> > Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> >>> +
> >>> + * Conversely, shared_table is decreased when a vrf is de-associated
> >>> + * from a table with exactly two associated vrfs.
> >>> + */
> >>> + int shared_tables;
> >>
> >> Should this be unsigned?
> >> Should it be a fixed size?
> >
> > Yes. I think an u32 would be reasonable for the shared_table.
> > What do you think?
> >
>
> u32 or unsigned int is fine.

Hi David,
I will use the u32.

thanks,
Andrea

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-14 23:24    [W:0.073 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site