lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC,net-next, 2/5] vrf: track associations between VRF devices and tables
From
Date
On 6/13/20 4:53 PM, Andrea Mayer wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> thanks for your questions.
>
> On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 12:28:59 -0700
> Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
>>> +
>>> + * Conversely, shared_table is decreased when a vrf is de-associated
>>> + * from a table with exactly two associated vrfs.
>>> + */
>>> + int shared_tables;
>>
>> Should this be unsigned?
>> Should it be a fixed size?
>
> Yes. I think an u32 would be reasonable for the shared_table.
> What do you think?
>

u32 or unsigned int is fine.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-06-14 02:34    [W:0.087 / U:0.552 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site