lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Cleanups in "next" tree
From
Date
Pavel

On 4/3/20 1:45 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> On 4/3/20 12:57 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> On Sun 2020-03-22 14:35:56, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>
>>> On 3/22/20 12:59 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I've commited some cleanups into LED tree ( git/pavel/linux-leds.git
>>>> branch for-next ), if someone wants to review them.
>>> You abused your maintainer power by bypassing the usual patch
>>> submission procedure. Please remove the patches from linux-next
>>> and submit them officially for discussion. I would have some objections
>>> to them.
>> I'm sorry I failed to meet your high expectations... But I don't
>> believe I done anything completely outside of usual kernel procedures.
> I believe code review is quite usual kernel procedure.
>
>> Could you list the patches and objections you have?
> I already expressed my concerns regarding Turris Omnia patch.
>
> My comments regarding remaining patches:
>
> - "Make label "white:power" to be consistent with"
>
> I disagree here. "system" was OK.
>
> - "Warn about old defines that probably should not be used."
>
> Obsolete is only LED_FULL, so the comment is in wrong line

I would prefer to have the commit sha that obsoleted the LED_FULL to be
referenced in the commit message so we have traceability.

Dan

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-03 21:14    [W:0.046 / U:2.292 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site