lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] tty: samsung_tty: 32-bit access for TX/RX hold registers
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 07:20:41PM +0900, Hyunki Koo wrote:
> Support 32-bit access for the TX/RX hold registers UTXH and URXH.
>
> This is required for some newer SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hyunki Koo <hyunki00.koo@samsung.com>
> ---
> v3: change rd_regl to rd_reg in line 954 for backward compatibility.

I cannot find this change against v2.

> ---
>
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> index 73f951d65b93..a674a80163ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> @@ -154,12 +154,47 @@ struct s3c24xx_uart_port {
> #define portaddrl(port, reg) \
> ((unsigned long *)(unsigned long)((port)->membase + (reg)))
>
> -#define rd_regb(port, reg) (readb_relaxed(portaddr(port, reg)))
> +static unsigned int rd_reg(struct uart_port *port, int reg)

You should return here u32 to be consistent with readl_relaxed.

> +{
> + switch (port->iotype) {
> + case UPIO_MEM:
> + return readb_relaxed(portaddr(port, reg));
> + case UPIO_MEM32:
> + return readl_relaxed(portaddr(port, reg));
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> #define rd_regl(port, reg) (readl_relaxed(portaddr(port, reg)))
>
> -#define wr_regb(port, reg, val) writeb_relaxed(val, portaddr(port, reg))
> +static void wr_reg(struct uart_port *port, int reg, int val)

val should be u32.

> +{
> + switch (port->iotype) {
> + case UPIO_MEM:
> + writeb_relaxed(val, portaddr(port, reg));
> + break;
> + case UPIO_MEM32:
> + writel_relaxed(val, portaddr(port, reg));
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> #define wr_regl(port, reg, val) writel_relaxed(val, portaddr(port, reg))
>
> +static void write_buf(struct uart_port *port, int reg, int val)

buf is misleading, you do not write here any buffer. Maybe
"wr_reg_barrier()" or "wr_reg_order()"?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-03 12:49    [W:0.238 / U:0.240 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site