lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 1/2] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage
Date
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

It seems that the existing documentation is not explicit about the
expected usage and potential risks enough. While it is calls out
that users have to free memory when using this flag it is not really
apparent that users have to careful to not deplete memory reserves
and that they should implement some sort of throttling wrt. freeing
process.

This is partly based on Neil's explanation [1].

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/877dz0yxoa.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
include/linux/gfp.h | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
index e5b817cb86e7..e3ab1c0d9140 100644
--- a/include/linux/gfp.h
+++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct;
* the caller guarantees the allocation will allow more memory to be freed
* very shortly e.g. process exiting or swapping. Users either should
* be the MM or co-ordinating closely with the VM (e.g. swap over NFS).
+ * Users of this flag have to be extremely careful to not deplete the reserve
+ * completely and implement a throttling mechanism which controls the consumption
+ * of the reserve based on the amount of freed memory.
*
* %__GFP_NOMEMALLOC is used to explicitly forbid access to emergency reserves.
* This takes precedence over the %__GFP_MEMALLOC flag if both are set.
--
2.25.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-03 10:37    [W:0.108 / U:1.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site