lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: lpddr: Replace printk with pr_notice
Hi Gustavo,

"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote on Mon, 27 Apr
2020 14:10:36 -0500:

> On 4/27/20 14:01, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 14:03 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >> pr_notice is preferred over printk.
> >
> > So is coalescing formats
> >
> > ? diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h b/include/linux/mtd/pfow.h
> > []
> >> @@ -127,31 +127,31 @@ static inline void print_drs_error(unsigned dsr)
> >> int prog_status = (dsr & DSR_RPS) >> 8;
> >>
> >> if (!(dsr & DSR_AVAILABLE))
> >> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> >> + pr_notice("DSR.15: (0) Device not Available\n");
> >> if ((prog_status & 0x03) == 0x03)
> >> - printk(KERN_NOTICE"DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> >> + pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid "
> >> "half with 41h command\n");
> >
> > pr_notice("DSR.9,8: (11) Attempt to program invalid half with 41h command\n");
> >
>
> I didn't want to mess with the rest of format, because some maintainers
> don't like that. If Miquel is OK with that, I can fix that up, too.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Gustavo

I'm fine with it in this case, just mention it in the commit log,
please.

Thanks,
Miquèl

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-27 21:16    [W:0.108 / U:0.564 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site