lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 7/9] input: elants: support 0x66 reply opcode for reporting touches
From
Date
26.04.2020 08:15, Dmitry Torokhov пишет:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 03:32:26PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
>> From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>>
>> eKTF3624 touchscreen firmware uses two variants of the reply opcodes for
>> reporting touch events: one is 0x63 (used by older firmware) and other is
>> 0x66 (used by newer firmware). The 0x66 variant is equal to 0x63 of
>> eKTH3500, while 0x63 needs small adjustment of the touch pressure value.
>>
>> Nexus 7 tablet device has eKTF3624 touchscreen and it uses 0x66 opcode for
>> reporting touch events, let's support it now. Other devices, eg. ASUS TF300T,
>> use 0x63.
>>
>> Note: CMD_HEADER_REK is used for replying to calibration requests, it has
>> the same 0x66 opcode number which eKTF3624 uses for reporting touches.
>> The calibration replies are handled separately from the the rest of the
>> commands in the driver by entering into ELAN_WAIT_RECALIBRATION state
>> and thus this change shouldn't change the old behavior.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
>> Tested-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
>> Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
>> index 2b936e920874..9751139e8507 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/elants_i2c.c
>> @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@
>> #define QUEUE_HEADER_NORMAL 0X63
>> #define QUEUE_HEADER_WAIT 0x64
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Depending on firmware version, eKTF3624 touchscreens may utilize one of
>> + * these opcodes for the touch events: 0x63 and 0x66. The 0x63 is used by
>> + * older firmware version and differs from 0x66 such that touch pressure
>> + * value needs to be adjusted.
>
> Who is responsible for the adjustment? Where does it happen?


Please see the patch #2 ("support old touch report format") which adds
support for parsing of the older packet format that requires the
pressure value adjustment.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-26 07:22    [W:0.074 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site