lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/7] mm/sparse.c: introduce a new function clear_subsection_map()
On 03/09/20 at 02:38pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 09.03.20 14:32, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 03/09/20 at 09:59am, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> On 07.03.20 09:42, Baoquan He wrote:
> >>> Factor out the code which clear subsection map of one memory region from
> >>> section_deactivate() into clear_subsection_map().
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> mm/sparse.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> >>> index e37c0abcdc89..d9dcd58d5c1d 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> >>> @@ -726,15 +726,11 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
> >>> }
> >>> #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP */
> >>>
> >>> -static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> >>> - struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> >>> +static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> >>> {
> >>> DECLARE_BITMAP(map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
> >>> DECLARE_BITMAP(tmp, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
> >>> struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
> >>> - bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
> >>> - struct page *memmap = NULL;
> >>> - bool empty = false;
> >>> unsigned long *subsection_map = ms->usage
> >>> ? &ms->usage->subsection_map[0] : NULL;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -745,8 +741,31 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> >>> if (WARN(!subsection_map || !bitmap_equal(tmp, map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION),
> >>> "section already deactivated (%#lx + %ld)\n",
> >>> pfn, nr_pages))
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> + bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
> >>> +
> >>
> >> Nit: I'd drop this line.
> >
> > It's fine to me. I usually keep one line for the returning. I will
> > remove it when update.
> >
> >>
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static bool is_subsection_map_empty(struct mem_section *ms)
> >>> +{
> >>> + return bitmap_empty(&ms->usage->subsection_map[0],
> >>> + SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> >>> + struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
> >>> + bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
> >>> + struct page *memmap = NULL;
> >>> + bool empty = false;
> >>
> >> Nit: No need to initialize empty.
> >
> > This is inherited from patch 1.
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> + if (clear_subsection_map(pfn, nr_pages))
> >>> return;
> >>>
> >>
> >> Nit: I'd drop this empty line.
> >>
> >>> + empty = is_subsection_map_empty(ms);
> >>> /*
> >>> * There are 3 cases to handle across two configurations
> >>> * (SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n}):
> >>> @@ -764,8 +783,6 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> >>> *
> >>> * For 2/ and 3/ the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n} cases are unified
> >>> */
> >>> - bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
> >>> - empty = bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
> >>
> >> I do wonder why you moved this up the comment?
> >
> > Since this empty will cover two places of handling, so moved it up,
> > seems this is what I was thinking. Can move it back here.
>
> You're moving the whole comment later, was just wondering (makes it
> slightly harder to review).

I see, sorry for the confusion. I will move it back when repost.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-09 15:08    [W:0.067 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site