lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 5/5] PM / devfreq: tegra30: Make CPUFreq notifier to take into account boosting
From
Date
Hi Dmitry,

On 3/31/20 8:16 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> MCCPU frequency boosting needs to be taken into account in order to avoid
> scheduling of unnecessary devfreq updates.

"in order to avoid scheduling of unnecessary devfreq updates."
I don't understand the correct meaning of following description.
Could you explain it more detailed?

>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> index 34f6291e880c..3b57aac9894c 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c
> @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ tegra_actmon_cpufreq_contribution(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra,
>
> static_cpu_emc_freq = actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(tegra, cpu_freq);
>
> - if (dev_freq >= static_cpu_emc_freq)
> + if (dev_freq + actmon_dev->boost_freq >= static_cpu_emc_freq)
> return 0;
>
> return static_cpu_emc_freq;
>


--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-04-01 01:20    [W:0.149 / U:6.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site