lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: don't dequeue requests on already disabled endpoints
Date

Hi,

Michael Grzeschik <mgr@pengutronix.de> writes:
>> > dwc3_gadget_ep_disable gets called before the last request gets
>> > dequeued.
>> >
>> > In __dwc3_gadget_ep_disable all started, pending and cancelled
>> > lists for this endpoint will call dwc3_gadget_giveback in
>> > dwc3_remove_requests.
>> >
>> > After that no list containing the afterwards dequed request,
>> > therefor it is not necessary to run the dequeue routine.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <m.grzeschik@pengutronix.de>
>> > ---
>> > @Lars-Peter Clausen:
>> >
>> > This patch addresses the case that not queued requests get dequeued.
>> > The only case that this happens seems on disabling the gadget.
>> >
>> > drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 3 +++
>> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> > index 9a6f741d1db0dc..5d4fa8d6c93e49 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
>> > @@ -1609,6 +1609,9 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue(struct usb_ep *ep,
>> >
>> > trace_dwc3_ep_dequeue(req);
>> >
>> > + if (!(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_ENABLED))
>> > + return 0;
>>
>> which driver is trying to call dequeue after the endpoint is disabled?
>> Got some tracepoints of the problem happening?
>
> I see the case when using uvc-gadget.
>
> Look into uvc_v4l2_release in uvc_v4l2.c:
>
> uvc_function_disconnect
> composite_disconnect
> reset_config
> uvc_function_disable->usb_ep_disable
>
> uvcg_video_enable
> usb_ep_dequeue
> dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue

Oh, I see what you mean. We get a disconnect, which disables the
endpoints, which forces all requests to be dequeued. Now I remember why
this exists: we giveback the requests from disconnect because not all
gadget drivers will call usb_ep_dequeue() if simply told about the
disconnect. Then UDC drivers have to be a little more careful and make
sure that all requests are givenback.

In any case, why is it a problem to call usb_ep_dequeue()? Is it only
because of that dev_err()? We could just remove that message,
really. Eventually, I want to move more of this logic into UDC core so
udc drivers can be simplified. For that work, though, first we would
have to add a "generic" struct usb_ep_hw implementation and manage list
of requests as part of UDC core as well.

--
balbi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-30 09:19    [W:0.107 / U:4.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site