lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH 0/6] Kill setup_irq()
Date
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-hexagon-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-hexagon-
> owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of afzal mohammed
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2020 11:08 AM
> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org; linux-
> sh@vger.kernel.org; linux-s390@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> mips@vger.kernel.org; linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org; linux-
> ia64@vger.kernel.org; linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org; linux-c6x-dev@linux-
> c6x.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] Kill setup_irq()
...
> Note 1: sh toolchain is available, but that will not make the relevant
changes
> compile as it has dependency of 64bit arch toolchain, did try a Kconfig
hack
> to make it compile w/ 32bit sh toolchain, but it failed due to other
reasons
> (unknown operands), so gave up on that.
> Note 2: hexagon final image creation fails even w/o my patch, but it has
> been ensured that w/ my changes relevant object files are getting built
w/o
> warnings.

Afzal,

What's the nature of the failure in "Note 2"?

-Brian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-28 03:49    [W:0.119 / U:4.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site