lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Fix an error handling path in 'k3_udma_glue_cfg_rx_flow()'
From
Date
Hi Christophe,

On 16/03/2020 09:20, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On 15/03/2020 17.50, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> All but one error handling paths in the 'k3_udma_glue_cfg_rx_flow()'
>> function 'goto err' and call 'k3_udma_glue_release_rx_flow()'.
>>
>> This not correct because this function has a 'channel->flows_ready--;' at
>> the end, but 'flows_ready' has not been incremented here, when we branch to
>> the error handling path.
>>
>> In order to keep a correct value in 'flows_ready', un-roll
>> 'k3_udma_glue_release_rx_flow()', simplify it, add some labels and branch
>> at the correct places when an error is detected.
>
> Good catch!
>
>> Doing so, we also NULLify 'flow->udma_rflow' in a path that was lacking it.
>
> Even better catch ;)
>
>> Fixes: d70241913413 ("dmaengine: ti: k3-udma: Add glue layer for non DMAengine user")
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
>> ---
>> Not sure that the last point of the description is correct. Maybe, the
>> 'xudma_rflow_put / return -ENODEV;' should be kept in order not to
>> override 'flow->udma_rflow'.
>> ---
>> drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> index dbccdc7c0ed5..890573eb1625 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti/k3-udma-glue.c
>> @@ -578,12 +578,12 @@ static int k3_udma_glue_cfg_rx_flow(struct k3_udma_glue_rx_channel *rx_chn,
>> if (IS_ERR(flow->udma_rflow)) {
>> ret = PTR_ERR(flow->udma_rflow);
>> dev_err(dev, "UDMAX rflow get err %d\n", ret);
>> - goto err;
>> + goto err_return;
>
> return err; ?
>
>> }
>
> Optionally you could have moved the
> rx_chn->flows_ready++;
> here and

Thank you for your patch.

I tend to agree with Peter here - just may be with comment that it will be dec in
k3_udma_glue_release_rx_flow().
All clean ups were moved in standalone function intentionally to avoid
code duplication in err and normal channel release path, and avoid common errors
when normal path is fixed, but err path missed.



>
>>
>> if (flow->udma_rflow_id != xudma_rflow_get_id(flow->udma_rflow)) {
>> - xudma_rflow_put(rx_chn->common.udmax, flow->udma_rflow);
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto err_rflow_put;
>
> goto err;
>
>> }
>>
>> /* request and cfg rings */
>> @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static int k3_udma_glue_cfg_rx_flow(struct k3_udma_glue_rx_channel *rx_chn,
>> if (!flow->ringrx) {
>> ret = -ENODEV;
>> dev_err(dev, "Failed to get RX ring\n");
>> - goto err;
>> + goto err_rflow_put;
>> }
>>
>> flow->ringrxfdq = k3_ringacc_request_ring(rx_chn->common.ringacc,
>> @@ -600,19 +600,19 @@ static int k3_udma_glue_cfg_rx_flow(struct k3_udma_glue_rx_channel *rx_chn,
>> if (!flow->ringrxfdq) {
>> ret = -ENODEV;
>> dev_err(dev, "Failed to get RXFDQ ring\n");
>> - goto err;
>> + goto err_ringrx_free;
>> }
>>
>> ret = k3_ringacc_ring_cfg(flow->ringrx, &flow_cfg->rx_cfg);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "Failed to cfg ringrx %d\n", ret);
>> - goto err;
>> + goto err_ringrxfdq_free;
>> }
>>
>> ret = k3_ringacc_ring_cfg(flow->ringrxfdq, &flow_cfg->rxfdq_cfg);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "Failed to cfg ringrxfdq %d\n", ret);
>> - goto err;
>> + goto err_ringrxfdq_free;
>> }
>>
>> if (rx_chn->remote) {
>> @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int k3_udma_glue_cfg_rx_flow(struct k3_udma_glue_rx_channel *rx_chn,
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "flow%d config failed: %d\n", flow->udma_rflow_id,
>> ret);
>> - goto err;
>> + goto err_ringrxfdq_free;
>> }
>>
>> rx_chn->flows_ready++;
>> @@ -670,8 +670,18 @@ static int k3_udma_glue_cfg_rx_flow(struct k3_udma_glue_rx_channel *rx_chn,
>> flow->udma_rflow_id, rx_chn->flows_ready);
>>
>> return 0;
>> -err:
>> - k3_udma_glue_release_rx_flow(rx_chn, flow_idx);
>> +
>> +err_ringrxfdq_free:
>> + k3_ringacc_ring_free(flow->ringrxfdq);
>> +
>> +err_ringrx_free:
>> + k3_ringacc_ring_free(flow->ringrx);
>> +
>> +err_rflow_put:
>> + xudma_rflow_put(rx_chn->common.udmax, flow->udma_rflow);
>> + flow->udma_rflow = NULL;
>> +
>> +err_return:
>
> You could have kept the single err label and just copy the
> release_rx_flow() without the rx_chn->flows_ready--;
>
> I don't have anything against multiple labels as such, but a single one
> might be easier to follow?
>
> and you don't need the err_return, just return in place when you would
> jump to it.
>
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>>
>
> - Péter
>
> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
> Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
>

--
Best regards,
grygorii

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-17 08:52    [W:0.087 / U:1.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site