lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: pwm: document the PWM polarity flag
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:32:26PM +0200, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote:
> Add the description of PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@toradex.com>
> ---
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt
> index 084886bd721e..440c6b9a6a4e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ period in nanoseconds.
> Optionally, the pwm-specifier can encode a number of flags (defined in
> <dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h>) in a third cell:
> - PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED: invert the PWM signal polarity
> +- PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL: don't invert the PWM signal polarity

This doesn't make sense. PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL is not part of the DT ABI.
The third cell of the specifier is a bitmask of flags.

PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL is an enumeration value that evaluates to 0, so it
makes absolutely no sense as a flag. PWM signals are considered to be
"normal" by default, so no flag is necessary to specify that.

Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-17 18:44    [W:0.071 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site