| From | Linus Torvalds <> | Date | Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:42:18 -0700 | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 27/69] namei: invert the meaning of WALK_FOLLOW |
| |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 4:56 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > - !(flags & WALK_FOLLOW || nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW) || > - flags & WALK_NOFOLLOW) { > + ((flags & WALK_TRAILING) && !(nd->flags & LOOKUP_FOLLOW)) || > + (flags & WALK_NOFOLLOW)) {
Oh, and here you fix the implicit precedence thing I was complaining about earlier.
Maybe my original complaint had happened at this point, and I'd missed the original place.
Likely.
Linus
|