lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/4] mtd: rawnand: Add support manufacturer specific lock/unlock operation
Hi Mason, Boris,

masonccyang@mxic.com.tw wrote on Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:40:04 +0800:

> Hi Boris,
>
> > > Add nand_lock() & nand_unlock() for manufacturer specific lock &
> unlock
> > > operation while the device supports Block Portection function.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@mxic.com.tw>
> > > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > Reported-by on something that's not a fix doesn't make sense. I know
> > the 0day bot asked you to add this tag, but that should only be done if
> > you submit a separate patch, ideally with a Fixes tag. If the offending
> > patch has not been merged yet, you should just fix the commit and ignore
> > the Reported-by tag (you can mention who reported the problem in the
> > changelog though).

Yesterday when applying all the NAND patches my personal IP address got
flagged as spam by mistake (~500 mails in ~10s) so I could not answer
manually as I wished.

Indeed, this Reported-by tag was not needed and I dropped it manually
when applying. This tag is meant to show an error that was existing
*before* your series and that you are fixing with your series. This is
not something you should add when a robot tells you something is wrong
in your series.

Also, I rewrote several paragraphs and I prefixed two of them with "mtd:
rawnand: macronix:".

Thanks,
Miquèl

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-11 08:26    [W:0.060 / U:2.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site