[lkml]   [2020]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v28 14/22] selftests/x86: Add a selftest for SGX
On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 23:32:10 -0600, Dr. Greg <> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 01:36:01AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Good evening, I hope the end of the week is going well for everyone.
>> Add a selftest for SGX. It is a trivial test where a simple enclave
>> copies one 64-bit word of memory between two memory locations given
>> to the enclave as arguments. Use ENCLS[EENTER] to invoke the
>> enclave.
> Just as a clarification, are you testing the new driver against signed
> production class enclaves in .so format that also include metadata
> layout directives or is the driver just getting tested against the two
> page toy enclave that copies a word of memory from one memory location
> to another?

We (Intel SGX SDK/PSW team) tested this driver for enclaves in .so format
with metadata. Our 2.8 release supports v24 and 2.9 supports v25+. Both
production signed and debug signed enclaves worked.

*Note* we did make some code changes in our runtime for v24+, mainly
dealing with src & EPC page alignment for EADD, open one fd per enclave,
use -z noexecstack linker option, etc. You can see the changes on GitHub.

> Our PSW/runtime is currently failing to initialize production class
> enclaves secondary to a return value of -4 from the ENCLU[EINIT]
> instruction, which means the measurement of the loaded enclave has
> failed to match the value in the signature structure.
> The same enclave loads fine with the out of kernel driver. Our
> diagnostics tell us we are feeding identical page streams and
> permissions to the page add ioctl's of both drivers. The identity
> modulus signature of the signing key for the enclave is being written
> to the launch control registers.
> We see the same behavior from both our unit test enclaves and the
> Quoting Enclave from the Intel SGX runtime.
We did not see any issue loading QE in our tests. Please directly email me
on this test if you have specific questions.

> When we ported our runtime loader to the new driver ABI we kept things
> simple and add only a single page at a time in order to replicate the
> behavior of the old driver.
> Secondly, we were wondering what distribution you are building the
> self-tests with? Initial indications are that the selftest signing
> utility doesn't build properly with OpenSSL 1.1.1.
> Have a good day.
> Dr. Greg
> As always,
> Dr. Greg Wettstein, Ph.D, Worker
> IDfusion, LLC SGX secured infrastructure and
> 4206 N. 19th Ave. autonomously self-defensive platforms.
> Fargo, ND 58102
> PH: 701-281-1686 EMAIL:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> "Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any
> good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats."
> -- Howard Aiken

Using Opera's mail client:

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-03-10 20:31    [W:0.149 / U:2.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site