[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Are people from linux-mediatek also interested in Mediatek MIPS SoCs? [Was: [PATCH] staging: mt7621-dts: add dt node for 2nd/3rd uart on mt7621]

On 06/02/2020 08:53, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 6:37 PM Dan Carpenter <> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 05:59:21PM +0800, Chuanhong Guo wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:47 PM Dan Carpenter <> wrote:
>>>> Please use ./scripts/ to pick the CC list and resend.
>>>> The MAINTAINERS file says Matthias Brugger is supposed to be CC'd and
>>>> a couple other email lists.
>>> According to, Matthias Brugger is the maintainer of
>>> Mediatek ARM SoC:
>>> Matthias Brugger <> (maintainer:ARM/Mediatek SoC support)
>>> (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support)
>>> (moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support)
>>> I specifically removed the above 3 addresses because they are all for
>>> Mediatek ARM chips
>>> while mt7621 is a mips chip and belongs to ralink target under
>>> /arch/mips/mach-ralink.
>>> Code contribution for mt7621 goes through linux-mips instead of
>>> linux-arm or linux-mediatek,
>> I would have thought that we would still CC linux-mediatek?
>>> I thinks this is an incorrect setup of and should be
>>> corrected.
>> We could ask him...
>> It's always easiest to fix MAINTAINERS instead of remembering all the
>> exceptions and rules.
> Hi Matthias and other folks on linux-mediatek:
> I noticed that reports "ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
> e-mail addreses for MTK MIPS SoCs (mt7620/mt7621/mt76x8) because of
> "mt[678]" name match in MAINTAINERS file.
> This is confusing because these MIPS SoCs clearly don't fall into
> "ARM" category. Is this an incorrect match or is it intentional? If
> it's intentional I think we should remove the confusing ARM prefix,
> and if it's incorrect we may need to figure out how to exclude
> mt7620/mt7621/mt76x8 from "ARM/Mediatek SoC support".

That's a good question. I think it's an accident as I don't have good knowledge
of the MIPS architecture. Also I try to track the upstream support for MIPS as well:


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-09 19:30    [W:0.055 / U:2.952 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site