Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 4 Feb 2020 11:51:18 +0530 | From | Vinod Koul <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] dmaengine: Stear users towards dma_request_slave_chan() |
| |
On 03-02-20, 12:37, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:32 PM Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote: > > > dma_request_slave_channel_reason() no longer have user in mainline, it > > can be removed. > > > > Advise users of dma_request_slave_channel() and > > dma_request_slave_channel_compat() to move to dma_request_slave_chan() > > How? There are legacy ARM boards you have to care / remove before. > DMAengine subsystem makes a p*s off decisions without taking care of > (I'm talking now about dma release callback, for example) end users.
Can you elaborate issue you are seeing with dma_release callback?
-- ~Vinod
|  |