Messages in this thread Patch in this message |  | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 5.4 06/90] e1000e: Drop unnecessary __E1000_DOWN bit twiddling | Date | Mon, 3 Feb 2020 16:19:09 +0000 |
| |
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
[ Upstream commit daee5598e491d8d3979bd4ad6c447d89ce57b446 ]
Since we no longer check for __E1000_DOWN in e1000e_close we can drop the spot where we were restoring the bit. This saves us a bit of unnecessary complexity.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c index d7d56e42a6aac..aa9fdda839148 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c @@ -7407,15 +7407,13 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) { struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev); - bool down = test_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state); e1000e_ptp_remove(adapter); /* The timers may be rescheduled, so explicitly disable them * from being rescheduled. */ - if (!down) - set_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state); + set_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state); del_timer_sync(&adapter->phy_info_timer); cancel_work_sync(&adapter->reset_task); @@ -7435,9 +7433,6 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) } } - /* Don't lie to e1000_close() down the road. */ - if (!down) - clear_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state); unregister_netdev(netdev); if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev)) -- 2.20.1
|  |