Messages in this thread |  | | From | Andy Shevchenko <> | Date | Mon, 3 Feb 2020 12:37:27 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] dmaengine: Stear users towards dma_request_slave_chan() |
| |
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:32 PM Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote:
> dma_request_slave_channel_reason() no longer have user in mainline, it > can be removed. > > Advise users of dma_request_slave_channel() and > dma_request_slave_channel_compat() to move to dma_request_slave_chan()
How? There are legacy ARM boards you have to care / remove before. DMAengine subsystem makes a p*s off decisions without taking care of (I'm talking now about dma release callback, for example) end users. They will be scary for no reason.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
|  |