Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] dmaengine: Stear users towards dma_request_slave_chan() | From | John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <> | Date | Mon, 3 Feb 2020 21:21:16 +0100 |
| |
On 2/3/20 2:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Both rspi and sh-msiof have users on legacy SH (i.e. without DT):
FWIW, there is a patch set by Yoshinori Sato to add device tree support for classical SuperH hardware. It was never merged, unfortunately :(.
> Anyone who cares for DMA on SuperH?
What is DMA used for on SuperH? Wouldn't dropping it cut support for essential hardware features?
Adrian
-- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
|  |