lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/10] Hi,
From
Date
On 25. 02. 20 17:32, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 8:28 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 14. 02. 20 0:47, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 2:58 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am sending this series as before SMP support.
>>>> Most of these patches are clean ups and should be easy to review them. I
>>>> expect there will be more discussions about SMP support.
>>>
>>> While not really related to adding SMP, any chance you or someone
>>> could look at moving microblaze PCI support to drivers/pci/? I suspect
>>> much of the code should drop out as we have common helpers for much of
>>> it now. That would leave only powerpc and mips for DT+PCI platforms.
>>
>> can you please suggest changes which could be done?
>> I have CC Bharat and he could look at it.
>
> Look at the host controller drivers in drivers/pci/controller/.
> pci-host-{generic,common}.c is a good template to start with as that's
> a controller with standard config space accesses and no h/w setup
> needed. Essentially you need to call devm_pci_alloc_host_bridge(),
> pci_parse_request_of_pci_ranges() and pci_host_probe() with whatever
> h/w setup you need in between those calls.
>
> Looking at the microblaze PCI code, looks like you may need custom
> config space accessors which is quite common. Probably all the
> resource and device scanning can be removed. If you look at arm64, all
> the arch PCI code is just for ACPI.

Thanks Rob.

Bharat: Can you please take a look?

Thanks,
Michal

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-27 08:33    [W:0.106 / U:1.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site