lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/18] genirq: Remove setup_irq()
Date
Afzal,

afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> writes:

> While trying to understand internals of irq handling, came across a
> thread [1] in which tglx was referring to avoid usage of setup_irq().
> Existing callers of setup_irq() reached mostly via 'init_IRQ()' &
> 'time_init()', while memory allocators are ready by 'mm_init()'.
>
> Hence instances of setup_irq() is replaced by request_irq() &
> setup_irq() (along with remove_irq()) definition deleted in the last
> patch.
>
> Seldom remove_irq() usage has been observed coupled with setup_irq(),
> wherever that has been found, it too has been replaced by free_irq().

thanks a lot for tackling this!

Vs. merging this series, I suggest the following approach:

- Resubmit the individual changes as single patches or small series
to the relevant maintainers and subsystem mailing lists. They have
no dependency on a core change and can be applied where they belong
to.

- After 5.6-rc6, verify which parts have made their way into
linux-next and resubmit the ignored ones as a series to me along
with the removal of the core parts.

That way we can avoid conflicting changes between subsystems and the tip
irq/core branch as much as possible.

Thanks,

tglx

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-27 11:32    [W:0.345 / U:10.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site