lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 1/5] tools/memory-model: Add an exception for limitations on _unless() family
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 08:40:45AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> According to Luc, atomic_add_unless() is directly provided by herd7,
> therefore it can be used in litmus tests. So change the limitation
> section in README to unlimit the use of atomic_add_unless().
>
> Cc: Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/memory-model/README | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/memory-model/README b/tools/memory-model/README
> index fc07b52f2028..409211b1c544 100644
> --- a/tools/memory-model/README
> +++ b/tools/memory-model/README
> @@ -207,11 +207,15 @@ The Linux-kernel memory model (LKMM) has the following limitations:
> case as a store release.
>
> b. The "unless" RMW operations are not currently modeled:
> - atomic_long_add_unless(), atomic_add_unless(),
> - atomic_inc_unless_negative(), and
> - atomic_dec_unless_positive(). These can be emulated
> + atomic_long_add_unless(), atomic_inc_unless_negative(),
> + and atomic_dec_unless_positive(). These can be emulated
> in litmus tests, for example, by using atomic_cmpxchg().
>
> + One exception of this limitation is atomic_add_unless(),
> + which is provided directly by herd7 (so no corresponding
> + definition in linux-kernel.def). atomic_add_unless() is

Nit: Two spaces after period?

Andrea


> + modeled by herd7 therefore it can be used in litmus tests.
> +
> c. The call_rcu() function is not modeled. It can be
> emulated in litmus tests by adding another process that
> invokes synchronize_rcu() and the body of the callback
> --
> 2.25.0
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-27 18:54    [W:0.134 / U:0.536 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site