lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] EDAC: synopsys: Reorganizing the output message for CE/UE
From
Date
Hi Sherry,

On 24/02/2020 09:42, Sherry Sun wrote:
> The origin way which call sprintf() function two or three times to

(original? 'The current way' may be better)


> output message for CE/UE is incorrect, because it won't output all the
> message needed, instead it will only output the last message in
> sprintf().

Nice!


> So the simplest and most effective way to fix this problem
> is reorganizing all the output message needed for CE/UE into one
> sprintf() function.

This is a bug, but its in the middle of a series doing some cleanup, meaning the
maintainer can't easily pick it up in isolation. Could you post it separately?

'Reorganize' in the subject makes this sound like cleanup. Would "EDAC: synopsys: Fix back
to back snprintf() messages for CE/UE" be better?


Please add:
Fixes: b500b4a029d57 ("EDAC, synopsys: Add ECC support for ZynqMP DDR controller")

in the signed-off-by area so that stable trees pick this up.

and for what its worth:
Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>


Thanks!

James



> diff --git a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
> index 7046b8929522..ef7e907c7956 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/synopsys_edac.c
> @@ -485,20 +485,14 @@ static void handle_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct synps_ecc_status *p)
> pinf = &p->ceinfo;
> if (!priv->p_data->quirks) {
> snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> - "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d ",
> - "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
> - snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> - "Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x\n",
> + "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d Col %d Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x",
> + "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col,
> pinf->bitpos, pinf->data);
> } else {
> snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> - "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d ",
> - "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank);
> - snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> - "BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d ",
> - pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr);
> - snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> - "Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x\n",
> + "DDR ECC error type:%s Row %d Bank %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d Bit Position: %d Data: 0x%08x",
> + "CE", pinf->row, pinf->bank,
> + pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr,
> pinf->bitpos, pinf->data);
> }
>
> @@ -515,10 +509,8 @@ static void handle_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, struct synps_ecc_status *p)
> "UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank, pinf->col);
> } else {
> snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> - "DDR ECC error type :%s Row %d Bank %d ",
> - "UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank);
> - snprintf(priv->message, SYNPS_EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> - "BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d",
> + "DDR ECC error type :%s Row %d Bank %d BankGroup Number %d Block Number %d",
> + "UE", pinf->row, pinf->bank,
> pinf->bankgrpnr, pinf->blknr);
> }
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-26 18:50    [W:0.052 / U:5.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site