lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer v6
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 04:16:41PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
>
> > The only differences in V6 are due to Vincent's latest patch series.
> >
> > This is V5 which includes the latest versions of Vincent's patch
> > addressing review feedback. Patches 4-9 are Vincent's work plus one
> > important performance fix. Vincent's patches were retested and while
> > not presented in detail, it was mostly an improvement.
> >
> > Changelog since V5:
> > o Import Vincent's latest patch set
>
> > include/linux/sched.h | 31 ++-
> > include/trace/events/sched.h | 49 ++--
> > kernel/sched/core.c | 13 -
> > kernel/sched/debug.c | 17 +-
> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 626 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > kernel/sched/pelt.c | 59 ++--
> > kernel/sched/sched.h | 42 ++-
> > 7 files changed, 535 insertions(+), 302 deletions(-)
>
> Applied to tip:sched/core for v5.7 inclusion, thanks Mel and Vincent!
>

Thanks!

> Please base future iterations on top of a0f03b617c3b (current
> sched/core).
>

Will do.

However I noticed that "sched/fair: Fix find_idlest_group() to handle
CPU affinity" did not make it to tip/sched/core. Peter seemed to think it
was fine. Was it rejected or is it just sitting in Peter's queue somewhere?

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-25 13:00    [W:0.252 / U:6.492 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site