lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] drm/virtio: fix error check
Date
The >= compare op must happen in cpu byte order, doing it in
little endian fails on big endian machines like s390.

Reported-by: Sebastian Mitterle <smitterl@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
index cfe9c54f87a3..67caecde623e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ void virtio_gpu_dequeue_ctrl_func(struct work_struct *work)
trace_virtio_gpu_cmd_response(vgdev->ctrlq.vq, resp);

if (resp->type != cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_OK_NODATA)) {
- if (resp->type >= cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_ERR_UNSPEC)) {
+ if (le32_to_cpu(resp->type) >= VIRTIO_GPU_RESP_ERR_UNSPEC) {
struct virtio_gpu_ctrl_hdr *cmd;
cmd = virtio_gpu_vbuf_ctrl_hdr(entry);
DRM_ERROR_RATELIMITED("response 0x%x (command 0x%x)\n",
--
2.18.2
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-14 09:01    [W:0.040 / U:10.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site