lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH V9 02/10] iommu/uapi: Define a mask for bind data
From
Date
Hi Jacob,

On 1/29/20 7:01 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Memory type related guest PASID bind data can be grouped together for
> one simple check.
Those are flags related to memory type.
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200109095123.17ed5e6b@jacob-builder/
not sure the link is really helpful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/iommu.h | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
> index 4ad3496e5c43..fcafb6401430 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -284,7 +284,10 @@ struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data_vtd {
> __u32 pat;
> __u32 emt;
> };
> -
> +#define IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_EMT_MASK (IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_CD | \
> + IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_EMTE | \
> + IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_PCD | \
> + IOMMU_SVA_VTD_GPASID_PWT)
Why EMT rather than MT or MTS?
the spec says:
Those fields are treated as Reserved(0) for implementations not
supporting Memory Type (MTS=0 in Extended Capability Register).

> /**
> * struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data - Information about device and guest PASID binding
> * @version: Version of this data structure
>

Thanks

Eric

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-12 13:44    [W:0.280 / U:6.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site