lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 5/7] soc: mediatek: add MT6765 scpsys and subdomain support
From
Date
On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:26 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 07/02/2020 10:20, Macpaul Lin wrote:
> > From: Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@mediatek.com>
> >
> > This adds scpsys support for MT6765
> > Add subdomain support for MT6765:
> > isp, mm, connsys, mfg, and cam.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Owen Chen <owen.chen@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 130 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> > index f669d3754627..9940c6d13222 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
> > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> >
> > #include <dt-bindings/power/mt2701-power.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/power/mt2712-power.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/power/mt6765-power.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/power/mt6797-power.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/power/mt7622-power.h>
> > #include <dt-bindings/power/mt7623a-power.h>
> > @@ -749,6 +750,120 @@ static const struct scp_subdomain scp_subdomain_mt2712[] = {
> > {MT2712_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_SC2, MT2712_POWER_DOMAIN_MFG_SC3},
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * MT6765 power domain support
> > + */
> > +#define SPM_PWR_STATUS_MT6765 0x0180
> > +#define SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND_MT6765 0x0184
> > +
>
> The offsets are the same as for MT6797. Could we rename the define to something
> generic and move it up and put it just under SPM_PWR_STATUS_2ND? Probably as a
> separate patch.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
>
Loop more related owners in this mail loop.

After check it with our clock driver owners, there are different
generations of clock IPs. Because different smart phone chips require
different cost-function oriented design, even they use the same
generation of clock IPs, might not have the same offsets. Take MT6765
and MT6797 for example, the listed offsets are just coincidence.

Our clock driver owners will work on this to summarize the common offset
parts for each generations, but at this moment, we suggest just separate
the files for mt6797 and mt6765. Commonly used header should be come
with the next chip which clock IP just the same generation of mt6797 or
mt6765.

Thanks
Macpaul Lin


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-13 03:56    [W:0.108 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site