[lkml]   [2020]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] cgroup/pids: Separate semantics of related to pids.max
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 02:44:24PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Currently, when pids.max limit is breached in the hierarchy, the event
> is counted and reported in the cgroup where the forking task resides.
> This decouples the limit and the notification caused by the limit making
> it hard to detect when the actual limit was effected.
> Let's introduce new events:
> max
> The number of times the limit of the cgroup was hit.
> max.imposed
> The number of times fork failed in the cgroup because of self
> or ancestor limit.

Can you please follow the same convention as and



 \ /
  Last update: 2020-02-13 00:04    [W:0.062 / U:3.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site