Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] iommu/vt-d: Fix ineffective devTLB invalidation for subdevices | From | Lu Baolu <> | Date | Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:41:30 +0800 |
| |
Hi Yi,
On 2020/12/29 11:25, Liu Yi L wrote: > iommu_flush_dev_iotlb() is called to invalidate caches on device. It only > loops the devices which are full-attached to the domain. For sub-devices, > this is ineffective. This results in invalid caching entries left on the > device. Fix it by adding loop for subdevices as well. Also, the domain-> > has_iotlb_device needs to be updated when attaching to subdevices. > > Fixes: 67b8e02b5e761 ("iommu/vt-d: Aux-domain specific domain attach/detach") > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> > --- > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c > index d7720a836268..d48a60b61ba6 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c > @@ -719,6 +719,8 @@ static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain) > return nid; > } > > +static void domain_update_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain); > + > /* Some capabilities may be different across iommus */ > static void domain_update_iommu_cap(struct dmar_domain *domain) > { > @@ -744,6 +746,8 @@ static void domain_update_iommu_cap(struct dmar_domain *domain) > domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = __DOMAIN_MAX_ADDR(domain->gaw - 1); > else > domain->domain.geometry.aperture_end = __DOMAIN_MAX_ADDR(domain->gaw); > + > + domain_update_iotlb(domain); > } > > struct context_entry *iommu_context_addr(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u8 bus, > @@ -1464,17 +1468,22 @@ static void domain_update_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain) > > assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock); > > - list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) { > - struct pci_dev *pdev; > - > - if (!info->dev || !dev_is_pci(info->dev)) > - continue; > - > - pdev = to_pci_dev(info->dev); > - if (pdev->ats_enabled) { > + list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) > + if (info && info->ats_enabled) { > has_iotlb_device = true; > break; > } > + > + if (!has_iotlb_device) { > + struct subdev_domain_info *sinfo; > + > + list_for_each_entry(sinfo, &domain->subdevices, link_domain) { > + info = get_domain_info(sinfo->pdev); > + if (info && info->ats_enabled) { > + has_iotlb_device = true; > + break; > + } > + } > } > > domain->has_iotlb_device = has_iotlb_device; > @@ -1555,25 +1564,37 @@ static void iommu_disable_dev_iotlb(struct device_domain_info *info) > #endif > } > > +static void __iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(struct device_domain_info *info, > + u64 addr, unsigned int mask) > +{ > + u16 sid, qdep; > + > + if (!info || !info->ats_enabled) > + return; > + > + sid = info->bus << 8 | info->devfn; > + qdep = info->ats_qdep; > + qi_flush_dev_iotlb(info->iommu, sid, info->pfsid, > + qdep, addr, mask); > +} > + > static void iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain, > u64 addr, unsigned mask) > { > - u16 sid, qdep; > unsigned long flags; > struct device_domain_info *info; > + struct subdev_domain_info *sinfo; > > if (!domain->has_iotlb_device) > return; > > spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags); > - list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) { > - if (!info->ats_enabled) > - continue; > + list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) > + __iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(info, addr, mask); > > - sid = info->bus << 8 | info->devfn; > - qdep = info->ats_qdep; > - qi_flush_dev_iotlb(info->iommu, sid, info->pfsid, > - qdep, addr, mask); > + list_for_each_entry(sinfo, &domain->subdevices, link_domain) { > + __iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(get_domain_info(sinfo->pdev), > + addr, mask); > }
Nit: list_for_each_entry(sinfo, &domain->subdevices, link_domain) { info = get_domain_info(sinfo->pdev); __iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(info, addr, mask); }
Others look good to me.
Acked-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Best regards, baolu
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags); > } >
|  |