[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 3/3] [RFC] CPUFreq: Add support for cpu-perf-dependencies
On 06-11-20, 11:14, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> I also had similar doubts, because if we make frequency requests
> independently for each CPU, why not having N cooling devs, which
> will set independently QoS max freq for them...
> What convinced me:
> EAS and FIE would know the 'real' frequency of the cluster, IPA
> can use it also and have only one cooling device per cluster.
> We would like to keep this old style 'one cooling device per cpuset'.
> I don't have strong opinion and if it would appear that there are
> some errors in freq estimation for cluster, then maybe it does make
> more sense to have cdev per CPU...

Let me rephrase my question. What is it that doesn't work _correctly_
with cdev per cpufreq policy in your case? What doesn't work well if
the thermal stuff keeps looking at only the related_cpus thing and not
the cpu-perf-dependencies thing?


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-09 08:30    [W:0.082 / U:1.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site