lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v7 1/7] arm64: Add framework to turn IPI as NMI
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 21:03, Masayoshi Mizuma <msys.mizuma@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 05:14:41PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Introduce framework to turn an IPI as NMI using pseudo NMIs. The main
> > motivation for this feature is to have an IPI that can be leveraged to
> > invoke NMI functions on other CPUs.
> >
> > And current prospective users are NMI backtrace and KGDB CPUs round-up
> > whose support is added via future patches.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/nmi.h | 17 ++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
> > arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/nmi.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/nmi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/nmi.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..4cd14b6
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/nmi.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +#ifndef __ASM_NMI_H
> > +#define __ASM_NMI_H
> > +
> > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
> > +
> > +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> > +
> > +extern bool arm64_supports_nmi(void);
> > +extern void arm64_send_nmi(cpumask_t *mask);
> > +
> > +void set_smp_dynamic_ipi(int ipi);
> > +void dynamic_ipi_setup(int cpu);
> > +void dynamic_ipi_teardown(int cpu);
> > +
> > +#endif /* !__ASSEMBLER__ */
> > +#endif
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> > index bbaf0bc..525a1e0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ obj-y := debug-monitors.o entry.o irq.o fpsimd.o \
> > return_address.o cpuinfo.o cpu_errata.o \
> > cpufeature.o alternative.o cacheinfo.o \
> > smp.o smp_spin_table.o topology.o smccc-call.o \
> > - syscall.o proton-pack.o
> > + syscall.o proton-pack.o ipi_nmi.o
> >
> > targets += efi-entry.o
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..a945dcf
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * NMI support for IPIs
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Linaro Limited
> > + * Author: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/smp.h>
> > +
> > +#include <asm/nmi.h>
> > +
> > +static struct irq_desc *ipi_nmi_desc __read_mostly;
> > +static int ipi_nmi_id __read_mostly;
> > +
> > +bool arm64_supports_nmi(void)
> > +{
> > + if (ipi_nmi_desc)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + return false;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void arm64_send_nmi(cpumask_t *mask)
> > +{
> > + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ipi_nmi_desc))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + __ipi_send_mask(ipi_nmi_desc, mask);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t ipi_nmi_handler(int irq, void *data)
> > +{
> > + /* nop, NMI handlers for special features can be added here. */
> > +
> > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > +}
> > +
>
> > +void dynamic_ipi_setup(int cpu)
>
> cpu isn't used here, so void is better?
>
> void dynamic_ipi_setup(void)
>

Ack.

> > +{
> > + if (!ipi_nmi_desc)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (!prepare_percpu_nmi(ipi_nmi_id))
> > + enable_percpu_nmi(ipi_nmi_id, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> > +}
> > +
>
> > +void dynamic_ipi_teardown(int cpu)
>
> Same as here:
> void dynamic_ipi_teardown(void)
>

Ack.

> > +{
> > + if (!ipi_nmi_desc)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + disable_percpu_nmi(ipi_nmi_id);
> > + teardown_percpu_nmi(ipi_nmi_id);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __init set_smp_dynamic_ipi(int ipi)
> > +{
> > + if (!request_percpu_nmi(ipi, ipi_nmi_handler, "IPI", &cpu_number)) {
> > + ipi_nmi_desc = irq_to_desc(ipi);
> > + ipi_nmi_id = ipi;
> > + }
> > +}
> > --
>
> Otherwise, looks good to me. Please feel free to add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@jp.fujitsu.com>
>

Thanks.

-Sumit

> Thanks,
> Masa

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-04 13:51    [W:0.130 / U:1.876 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site