lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 18:54:18 +0800 Yu Kuai wrote:
> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, fman_port_probe() doesn't have a
> corresponding put_device(). Thus add jump target to fix the exception
> handling for this function implementation.
>
> Fixes: 0572054617f3 ("fsl/fman: fix dereference null return value")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> index d9baac0dbc7d..576ce6df3fce 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> @@ -1799,13 +1799,13 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
> of_node_put(fm_node);
> if (!fm_pdev) {
> err = -EINVAL;
> - goto return_err;
> + goto put_device;
> }

> @@ -1898,6 +1898,8 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>
> return_err:
> of_node_put(port_node);
> +put_device:
> + put_device(&fm_pdev->dev);
> free_port:
> kfree(port);
> return err;

This does not look right. You're jumping to put_device() when fm_pdev
is NULL?

The order of error handling should be the reverse of the order of
execution of the function.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-11-03 02:31    [W:0.108 / U:1.516 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site