[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/12] samples: configfs: order includes alphabetically
On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 3:43 PM Christoph Hellwig <> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:45:16PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <>
> >
> > The preferred coding style is to order all includes alphabetically for
> > improved readability. There's no need for the configfs header to come
> > last.
> Is it? People seem to have all kinds of weird opinions, but I don't
> think any ordering really makes sense. What does make sense it dropping
> the pointless empty line, so I've folded that into the next patch.

This is not just a baseless opinion, keeping headers sorted clearly
has an advantage: you more easily avoid duplicating includes, you see
right away if a header is already included or not. Many maintainers
will require ordering in new patches.

It's your call but it's better code with not much effort.


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-08 15:24    [W:0.085 / U:1.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site