lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/3] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework tegra_smmu_probe_device()
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 12:53:28PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 05:58:29PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > 02.10.2020 17:22, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> > > 02.10.2020 09:08, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> > >> -static void tegra_smmu_release_device(struct device *dev)
> > >> -{
> > >> - dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, NULL);
> > >> -}
> > >> +static void tegra_smmu_release_device(struct device *dev) {}
> > >
> > > Please keep the braces as-is.
> > >
> >
> > I noticed that you borrowed this style from the sun50i-iommu driver, but
> > this is a bit unusual coding style for the c files. At least to me it's
> > unusual to see header-style function stub in a middle of c file. But
> > maybe it's just me.
>
> I don't see a rule in ./Documentation/process/coding-style.rst
> against this, and there're plenty of drivers doing so. If you
> feel uncomfortable with this style, you may add a rule to that
> doc so everyone will follow :)

I also prefer braces on separate lines. Even better would be to just
drop this entirely and make ->release_device() optional. At least the
following drivers could be cleaned up that way:

* fsl-pamu
* msm-iommu
* sun50i-iommu
* tegra-gart
* tegra-smmu

And it looks like mtk-iommu and mtk-iommu-v1 do only iommu_fwspec_free()
in their ->release_device() implementations, but that's already done via
iommu_release_device().

Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-05 11:48    [W:0.107 / U:3.428 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site