lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 2/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Make polling a busy loop
Date
There's no reason we need to wait here to poll a register over i2c. The
i2c bus is inherently slow and delays are practically part of the
protocol because we have to wait for the device to respond to any
request for a register. Let's rely on the sleeping of the i2c controller
instead of adding any sort of delay here in the bridge driver.

Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>
Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
index a1ebfa95088c..c77f46a21aae 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
@@ -881,9 +881,9 @@ static ssize_t ti_sn_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,

regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_REG, request_val | AUX_CMD_SEND);

+ /* Zero delay loop because i2c transactions are slow already */
ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_REG, val,
- !(val & AUX_CMD_SEND), 200,
- 50 * 1000);
+ !(val & AUX_CMD_SEND), 0, 50 * 1000);
if (ret)
return ret;

--
Sent by a computer, using git, on the internet
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-30 02:18    [W:0.273 / U:6.580 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site