lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH v17 5/5] remoteproc: Add initial zynqmp R5 remoteproc driver
Date
Hi Michael, 

Thanks for the review. With the numerous sets of review, I think a few things got lost along the way that I will make sure to get encompassed in the next revision

- in bindings example, remove the '-1.0'
- remove the global rpu_mode var
^ the above I had thought was in v16 so sorry about that...

Otherwise I will fix up the memory management that is occurring in the driver as you describe.

Again thank you!
Ben

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Auchter <michael.auchter@ni.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 11:59 AM
> To: Ben Levinsky <BLEVINSK@xilinx.com>
> Cc: sunnyliangjy@gmail.com; punit1.agrawal@toshiba.co.jp; Stefano Stabellini
> <stefanos@xilinx.com>; Michal Simek <michals@xilinx.com>;
> devicetree@vger.kernel.org; mathieu.poirier@linaro.org; linux-
> remoteproc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> robh+dt@kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 5/5] remoteproc: Add initial zynqmp R5 remoteproc
> driver
>
> Hey Ben,
>
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 02:05:41PM -0700, Ben Levinsky wrote:
> > R5 is included in Xilinx Zynq UltraScale MPSoC so by adding this
> > remotproc driver, we can boot the R5 sub-system in different 2
> > configurations -
> > * split
> > * lock-step
> >
> > The Xilinx R5 Remoteproc Driver boots the R5's via calls to the Xilinx
> > Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory
> access
> > and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this
> > driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wendy Liang <wendy.liang@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ed Mooring <ed.mooring@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wu <j.wu@xilinx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - remove domain struct as per review from Mathieu
> > v3:
> > - add xilinx-related platform mgmt fn's instead of wrapping around
> > function pointer in xilinx eemi ops struct
> > v4:
> > - add default values for enums
> > - fix formatting as per checkpatch.pl --strict. Note that 1 warning and 1
> check
> > are still raised as each is due to fixing the warning results in that
> > particular line going over 80 characters.
> > v5:
> > - parse_fw change from use of rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init to
> > rproc_mem_entry_init and use of alloc/release
> > - var's of type zynqmp_r5_pdata all have same local variable name
> > - use dev_dbg instead of dev_info
> > v6:
> > - adding memory carveouts is handled much more similarly. All mem
> > carveouts are
> > now described in reserved memory as needed. That is, TCM nodes are not
> > coupled to remoteproc anymore. This is reflected in the remoteproc R5
> > driver
> > and the device tree binding.
> > - remove mailbox from device tree binding as it is not necessary for elf
> > loading
> > - use lockstep-mode property for configuring RPU
> > v7:
> > - remove unused headers
> > - change u32 *lockstep_mode -> u32 lockstep_mode;
> > - change device-tree binding "lockstep-mode" to xlnx,cluster-mode
> > - remove zynqmp_r5_mem_probe and loop to Probe R5 memory devices at
> > remoteproc-probe time
> > - remove is_r5_mode_set from zynqmp rpu remote processor private data
> > - do not error out if no mailbox is provided
> > - remove zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe call of platform_set_drvdata as
> > pdata is
> > handled in zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove
> > v8:
> > - remove old acks, reviewed-by's in commit message
> > v9:
> > - as mboxes are now optional, if pdata->tx_mc_skbs not initialized then
> > do not call skb_queue_empty
> > - update usage for zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode,
> zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config and
> > zynqmp_pm_get_rpu_mode
> > - update 5/5 patch commit message to document supported configurations
> > and how they are booted by the driver.
> > - remove copyrights other than SPDX from zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c
> > - compilation warnings no longer raised
> > - remove unused includes from zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c
> > - remove unused var autoboot from zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c
> > - reorder zynqmp_r5_pdata fpr small mem savings due to alignment
> > - use of zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config now does not have
> > output arg
> > - in tcm handling, unconditionally use &= 0x000fffff mask since all nodes
> > in this fn are for tcm
> > - update comments for translating dma field in tcm handling to device
> > address
> > - update calls to rproc_mem_entry_init in parse_mem_regions so that there
> > are only 2 cases for types of carveouts instead of 3
> > - in parse_mem_regions, check if device tree node is null before using it
> > - add example device tree nodes used in parse_mem_regions and tcm
> parsing
> > - add comment for vring id node length
> > - add check for string length so that vring id is at least min length
> > - move tcm nodes from reserved mem to instead own device tree nodes
> > and only use them if enabled in device tree
> > - add comment for explaining handling of rproc_elf_load_rsc_table
> > - remove obsolete check for "if (vqid < 0)" in zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick
> > - remove unused field mems in struct zynqmp_r5_pdata
> > - remove call to zynqmp_r5_mem_probe and the fn itself as tcm handling
> > is done by zyqmp_r5_pm_request_tcm
> > - remove obsolete setting of dma_ops and parent device dma_mask
> > - remove obsolete use of of_dma_configure
> > - add comment for call to r5_set_mode fn
> > - make mbox usage optional and gracefully inform user via dev_dbg if not
> > present
> > - change var lockstep_mode from u32* to u32
> > v11:
> > - use enums instead of u32 where possible in zynqmp_r5_remoteproc
> > - update usage of zynqmp_pm_set/get_rpu_mode and
> zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config
> > - update prints to not use carriage return, just newline
> > - look up tcm banks via property in r5 node instead of string name
> > - print device tree nodes with %pOF instead of %s with node name field
> > - update tcm release to unmap VA
> > - handle r5-1 use case
> > v12:
> > - update signed off by so that latest developer name is last
> > - do not cast enums to u32s for zynqmp_pm* functions
> > v14:
> > - change zynqmp_r5_remoteproc::rpus and rpu_mode to static
> > - fix typo
> > - zynqmp_r5_remoteproc::r5_set_mode set rpu mode from
> > property specified in device tree
> > - use u32 instead of u32* to store in remoteproc memory entry private data
> > for pnode_id information
> > - always call r5_set_mode on probe
> > - remove alloc of zynqmp_r5_pdata in
> > zynqmp_r5_remoteproc::zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe as there is static
> > allocation already
> > - error at probe time if lockstep-mode property not present in device tree
> > - update commit message as per review
> > - remove dependency on MAILBOX in makefile as ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX is
> present
> > - remove unused macros
> > - update comment ordering of zynqmp_r5_pdata to match struct definition
> > - zynqmp_r5_remoteproc::tcm_mem_release error if pnode id is invalid
> > - remove obsolete TODOs
> > - only call zynqmp_r5_remoteproc::zynqmp_r5_probe if the index is valid
> > - remove uneven dev_dbg/dev_err fn calls
> > v15:
> > - if lockstep mode prop is present, then RPU cluster is in lockstep mode.
> > if not present, cluster is in split mode.
> > - if 2 RPUs provided but one is lockstep then error out as this is invalid
> > configuration
> > v16:
> > - replace of_get_property(dev->of_node, "lockstep-mode" with
> > of_property_read_bool
> > - propagate rpu mode specified in device tree through functions instead
> > of holding a global, static var
> > - check child remoteproc nodes via of_get_available_child_count before
> > looping through children
> > - replace check of "pdata->pnode_id == 0" instead by checking rpu's
> > zynqmp_r5_pdata* if NULL
> > - remove old, obsolete checks for dma_pools in
> zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove
> > - change rpus from zynqmp_r5_pdata[] to zynqmp_r5_pdata*[] so that
> > check for pdata->pnode_id == 0 is not needed
> > v17:
> > - fix style as per kernel test bot
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 8 +
> > drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c | 778
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 787 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> > index c6659dfea7c7..68e567c5375c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
> > @@ -275,6 +275,14 @@ config TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC
> > It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
> > the DSP slave processors.
> >
> > +config ZYNQMP_R5_REMOTEPROC
> > + tristate "ZynqMP_R5 remoteproc support"
> > + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP
> > + select RPMSG_VIRTIO
> > + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
> > + help
> > + Say y or m here to support ZynqMP R5 remote processors via the
> remote
> > + processor framework.
> > endif # REMOTEPROC
> >
> > endmenu
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> > index 3dfa28e6c701..ef1abff654c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
> > @@ -33,3 +33,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) +=
> st_remoteproc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_ZYNQMP_R5_REMOTEPROC) += zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..eacda5b3bbe7
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/zynqmp_r5_remoteproc.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,778 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Zynq R5 Remote Processor driver
> > + *
> > + * Based on origin OMAP and Zynq Remote Processor driver
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/list.h>
> > +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> > +#include <linux/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-message.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> > +#include <linux/skbuff.h>
> > +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
> > +
> > +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> > +
> > +#define MAX_RPROCS 2 /* Support up to 2 RPU */
> > +#define MAX_MEM_PNODES 4 /* Max power nodes for one RPU memory
> instance */
> > +
> > +#define BANK_LIST_PROP "meta-memory-regions"
> > +
> > +/* IPI buffer MAX length */
> > +#define IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX 32U
> > +/* RX mailbox client buffer max length */
> > +#define RX_MBOX_CLIENT_BUF_MAX (IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX + \
> > + sizeof(struct zynqmp_ipi_message))
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct zynqmp_r5_mem - zynqmp rpu memory data
> > + * @pnode_id: TCM power domain ids
> > + * @res: memory resource
> > + * @node: list node
> > + */
> > +struct zynqmp_r5_mem {
> > + u32 pnode_id[MAX_MEM_PNODES];
> > + struct resource res;
> > + struct list_head node;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct zynqmp_r5_pdata - zynqmp rpu remote processor private data
> > + * @rx_mc_buf: rx mailbox client buffer to save the rx message
> > + * @tx_mc: tx mailbox client
> > + * @rx_mc: rx mailbox client * @dev: device of RPU instance
> > + * @mbox_work: mbox_work for the RPU remoteproc
> > + * @tx_mc_skbs: socket buffers for tx mailbox client
> > + * @dev: device of RPU instance
> > + * @rproc: rproc handle
> > + * @tx_chan: tx mailbox channel
> > + * @rx_chan: rx mailbox channel
> > + * @pnode_id: RPU CPU power domain id
> > + */
> > +struct zynqmp_r5_pdata {
> > + unsigned char rx_mc_buf[RX_MBOX_CLIENT_BUF_MAX];
> > + struct mbox_client tx_mc;
> > + struct mbox_client rx_mc;
> > + struct work_struct mbox_work;
> > + struct sk_buff_head tx_mc_skbs;
> > + struct device dev;
> > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > + struct mbox_chan *tx_chan;
> > + struct mbox_chan *rx_chan;
> > + u32 pnode_id;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * table of RPUs
> > + */
> > +static struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *rpus[MAX_RPROCS];
> > +/**
> > + * RPU core configuration
> > + */
> > +static enum rpu_oper_mode rpu_mode;
>
> Hm, the changelog says: "propagate rpu mode specified in device tree
> through functions instead of holding a global, static var" but it looks
> like that wasn't done.
>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode
> > + * @pdata: Remote processor private data
> > + *
> > + * set RPU operation mode
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure
> > + */
> > +static int r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata)
> > +{
> > + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
> > + enum rpu_oper_mode cur_rpu_mode;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = zynqmp_pm_get_rpu_mode(pdata->pnode_id, &cur_rpu_mode);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (rpu_mode != cur_rpu_mode) {
> > + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(pdata->pnode_id,
> > + rpu_mode);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + tcm_mode = (rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP) ?
> > + PM_RPU_TCM_COMB : PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
> > + return zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(pdata->pnode_id, tcm_mode);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * ZynqMP R5 remoteproc memory release function
> > + */
> > +static int tcm_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry
> *mem)
> > +{
> > + u32 pnode_id = (u64)mem->priv;
> > +
> > + if (pnode_id <= 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + iounmap(mem->va);
> > + return zynqmp_pm_release_node(pnode_id);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * ZynqMP R5 remoteproc operations
> > + */
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata = rproc->priv;
> > + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
> > +
> > + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr & 0xF0000000) == 0xF0000000 ?
> > + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU boot from %s.",
> > + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
> > +
> > + return zynqmp_pm_request_wake(pdata->pnode_id, 1,
> > + bootmem,
> ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata = rproc->priv;
> > +
> > + return zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(pdata->pnode_id,
> > + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc,
> > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> > +{
> > + void *va;
> > +
> > + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /* Update memory entry va */
> > + mem->va = va;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
> > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> > +{
> > + iounmap(mem->va);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_mem_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > + int num_mems, i;
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata = rproc->priv;
> > + struct device *dev = &pdata->dev;
> > + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> > +
> > + num_mems = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "memory-region",
> NULL);
> > + if (num_mems <= 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) {
> > + struct device_node *node;
> > + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> > +
> > + node = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
> > + if (!node)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(node);
> > + if (!rmem)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (strstr(node->name, "vdev0vring")) {
> > + int vring_id;
> > + char name[16];
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * expecting form of "rpuXvdev0vringX as documented
> > + * in xilinx remoteproc device tree binding
> > + */
> > + if (strlen(node->name) < 14) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "%pOF is less than 14 chars",
> > + node);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * can be 1 of multiple vring IDs per IPC channel
> > + * e.g. 'vdev0vring0' and 'vdev0vring1'
> > + */
> > + vring_id = node->name[14] - '0';
> > + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "vdev0vring%d",
> vring_id);
> > + /* Register vring */
> > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL,
> > + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> > + rmem->size, rmem->base,
> > +
> zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc,
> > +
> zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release,
> > + name);
> > + } else {
> > + /* Register DMA region */
> > + int (*alloc)(struct rproc *r,
> > + struct rproc_mem_entry *rme);
> > + int (*release)(struct rproc *r,
> > + struct rproc_mem_entry *rme);
> > + char name[20];
> > +
> > + if (strstr(node->name, "vdev0buffer")) {
> > + alloc = NULL;
> > + release = NULL;
> > + strcpy(name, "vdev0buffer");
> > + } else {
> > + alloc = zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_alloc;
> > + release = zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_release;
> > + strcpy(name, node->name);
> > + }
> > +
> > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL,
> > + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> > + rmem->size, rmem->base,
> > + alloc, release, name);
> > + }
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* call Xilix Platform manager to request access to TCM bank */
>
> Xilinx
>
> > +static int zyqmp_r5_pm_request_tcm(struct device_node *tcm_node,
>
> zynqmp_r5_pm_request_tcm
>
> > + struct device *dev,
> > + u32 *pnode_id)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(tcm_node, "pnode-id", pnode_id);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return zynqmp_pm_request_node(*pnode_id,
> ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
> > + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Given tcm bank entry,
> > + * this callback will set device address for R5 running on TCM
> > + * and also setup virtual address for tcm bank remoteproc carveout
> > + */
> > +static int tcm_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc,
> > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> > +{
> > + void *va;
> > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> > +
> > + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /* Update memory entry va */
> > + mem->va = va;
> > +
> > + va = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, mem->da, mem->len);
> > + if (!va)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + /* As R5 is 32 bit, wipe out extra high bits */
> > + mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
> > + /*
> > + * handle tcm banks 1 a and b (0xffe90000 and oxffeb0000)
> > + * As both of these the only common bit found not in tcm bank0 a or
> b
> > + * is at 0x80000 use this mask to suss it out
> > + */
> > + if (mem->da & 0x80000)
> > + /*
> > + * need to do more to further translate
> > + * tcm banks 1a and 1b at 0xffe90000 and oxffeb0000
> > + * respectively to 0x0 and 0x20000
> > + */
> > + mem->da -= 0x90000;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance,
> > + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
> > + * needed for firmware to be loaded
> > + */
> > +static int parse_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > + int i, num_banks;
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata = rproc->priv;
> > + struct device *dev = &pdata->dev;
> > + struct device_node *r5_node = dev->of_node;
> > +
> > + /* go through tcm banks for r5 node */
> > + num_banks = of_count_phandle_with_args(r5_node,
> BANK_LIST_PROP, NULL);
> > + if (num_banks <= 0) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
> > + struct resource rsc;
> > + resource_size_t size;
> > + struct device_node *dt_node;
> > + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> > + int ret;
> > + u32 pnode_id; /* zynqmp_pm* fn's expect u32 */
> > +
> > + dt_node = of_parse_phandle(r5_node, BANK_LIST_PROP, i);
> > + if (!dt_node)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (of_device_is_available(dt_node)) {
> > + ret = of_address_to_resource(dt_node, 0, &rsc);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = zyqmp_r5_pm_request_tcm(dt_node, dev,
> &pnode_id);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* add carveout */
> > + size = resource_size(&rsc);
> > + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, rsc.start,
> > + (int)size, rsc.start,
> > + tcm_mem_alloc,
> > + tcm_mem_release,
> > + rsc.name);
> > + if (!mem)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + mem->priv = (void *)(u64)pnode_id;
> > + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware
> *fw)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata = rproc->priv;
> > + struct device *dev = &pdata->dev;
> > +
> > + ret = parse_tcm_banks(rproc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = parse_mem_regions(rproc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> > + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
> > + /*
> > + * resource table only required for IPC.
> > + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
> > + * for example, loading r5 hello world application
> > + * so simply inform user and keep going.
> > + */
> > + dev_info(dev, "no resource table found.\n");
> > + ret = 0;
> > + }
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* kick a firmware */
> > +static void zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
> > +{
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > + unsigned int skb_len;
> > + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *mb_msg;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata = rproc->priv;
> > +
> > + skb_len = (unsigned int)(sizeof(vqid) + sizeof(mb_msg));
> > + skb = alloc_skb(skb_len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (!skb)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + mb_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)skb_put(skb, skb_len);
> > + mb_msg->len = sizeof(vqid);
> > + memcpy(mb_msg->data, &vqid, sizeof(vqid));
> > + skb_queue_tail(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs, skb);
> > + ret = mbox_send_message(pdata->tx_chan, mb_msg);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to kick remote.\n");
> > + skb_dequeue_tail(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs);
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
> > + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
> > + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
> > + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> > + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
> > + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> > + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> > + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> > + .kick = zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * zynqmp_r5_release() - ZynqMP R5 device release function
> > + * @dev: pointer to the device struct of ZynqMP R5
> > + *
> > + * Function to release ZynqMP R5 device.
> > + */
> > +static void zynqmp_r5_release(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata;
> > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > +
> > + pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + rproc = pdata->rproc;
> > + if (rproc) {
> > + rproc_del(rproc);
> > + rproc_free(rproc);
> > + }
> > + if (pdata->tx_chan)
> > + mbox_free_channel(pdata->tx_chan);
> > + if (pdata->rx_chan)
> > + mbox_free_channel(pdata->rx_chan);
> > +
> > + /* Discard all SKBs if tx_mc_skbs is initialized */
> > + if (&pdata->tx_mc_skbs.prev) {
>
> This will always be true: it's taking the address of the prev member of
> tx_mc_skbs...
>
> > + while (!skb_queue_empty(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs)) {
> > + skb = skb_dequeue(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs);
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + device_unregister(dev);
>
> If zynqmp_r5_release is called, the refcount for dev has already dropped
> to 0... so this looks pretty suspicious.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * event_notified_idr_cb() - event notified idr callback
> > + * @id: idr id
> > + * @ptr: pointer to idr private data
> > + * @data: data passed to idr_for_each callback
> > + *
> > + * Pass notification to remoteproc virtio
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0. having return is to satisfy the idr_for_each() function
> > + * pointer input argument requirement.
> > + **/
> > +static int event_notified_idr_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc *rproc = data;
> > +
> > + (void)rproc_vq_interrupt(rproc, id);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * handle_event_notified() - remoteproc notification work funciton
> > + * @work: pointer to the work structure
> > + *
> > + * It checks each registered remoteproc notify IDs.
> > + */
> > +static void handle_event_notified(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata;
> > +
> > + pdata = container_of(work, struct zynqmp_r5_pdata, mbox_work);
> > +
> > + (void)mbox_send_message(pdata->rx_chan, NULL);
> > + rproc = pdata->rproc;
> > + /*
> > + * We only use IPI for interrupt. The firmware side may or may
> > + * not write the notifyid when it trigger IPI.
> > + * And thus, we scan through all the registered notifyids.
> > + */
> > + idr_for_each(&rproc->notifyids, event_notified_idr_cb, rproc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb() - Receive channel mailbox callback
> > + * @cl: mailbox client
> > + * @mssg: message pointer
> > + *
> > + * It will schedule the R5 notification work.
> > + */
> > +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg)
> > +{
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata;
> > +
> > + pdata = container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_pdata, rx_mc);
> > + if (mssg) {
> > + struct zynqmp_ipi_message *ipi_msg, *buf_msg;
> > + size_t len;
> > +
> > + ipi_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)mssg;
> > + buf_msg = (struct zynqmp_ipi_message *)pdata->rx_mc_buf;
> > + len = (ipi_msg->len >= IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX) ?
> > + IPI_BUF_LEN_MAX : ipi_msg->len;
> > + buf_msg->len = len;
> > + memcpy(buf_msg->data, ipi_msg->data, len);
> > + }
> > + schedule_work(&pdata->mbox_work);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done() - Request has been sent to the remote
> > + * @cl: mailbox client
> > + * @mssg: pointer to the message which has been sent
> > + * @r: status of last TX - OK or error
> > + *
> > + * It will be called by the mailbox framework when the last TX has done.
> > + */
> > +static void zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg, int
> r)
> > +{
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata;
> > + struct sk_buff *skb;
> > +
> > + if (!mssg)
> > + return;
> > + pdata = container_of(cl, struct zynqmp_r5_pdata, tx_mc);
> > + skb = skb_dequeue(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs);
> > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox() - Setup mailboxes
> > + *
> > + * @pdata: pointer to the ZynqMP R5 processor platform data
> > + * @node: pointer of the device node
> > + *
> > + * Function to setup mailboxes to talk to RPU.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> > + */
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata,
> > + struct device_node *node)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdata->dev;
> > + struct mbox_client *mclient;
> > +
> > + /* Setup TX mailbox channel client */
> > + mclient = &pdata->tx_mc;
> > + mclient->dev = dev;
> > + mclient->rx_callback = NULL;
> > + mclient->tx_block = false;
> > + mclient->knows_txdone = false;
> > + mclient->tx_done = zynqmp_r5_mb_tx_done;
> > +
> > + /* Setup TX mailbox channel client */
> > + mclient = &pdata->rx_mc;
> > + mclient->dev = dev;
> > + mclient->rx_callback = zynqmp_r5_mb_rx_cb;
> > + mclient->tx_block = false;
> > + mclient->knows_txdone = false;
> > +
> > + INIT_WORK(&pdata->mbox_work, handle_event_notified);
> > +
> > + /* Request TX and RX channels */
> > + pdata->tx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(&pdata->tx_mc,
> "tx");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pdata->tx_chan)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to request mbox tx channel.\n");
> > + pdata->tx_chan = NULL;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + pdata->rx_chan = mbox_request_channel_byname(&pdata->rx_mc,
> "rx");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pdata->rx_chan)) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to request mbox rx channel.\n");
> > + pdata->rx_chan = NULL;
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + skb_queue_head_init(&pdata->tx_mc_skbs);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * zynqmp_r5_probe() - Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
> > + * @pdata: pointer to the ZynqMP R5 processor platform data
> > + * @pdev: parent RPU domain platform device
> > + * @node: pointer of the device node
> > + *
> > + * Function to retrieve the information of the ZynqMP R5 device node.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> > + */
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_probe(struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata,
> > + struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + struct device_node *node)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > + int ret;
> > + struct device *dev = NULL;
> > +
> > + pdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> It doesn't look like this is freed anywhere. But, see the comments
> below around rproc_alloc.
>
> > + if (!pdata) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > + dev = &pdata->dev;
> > +
> > + /* Create device for ZynqMP R5 device */
> > + dev->parent = &pdev->dev;
> > + dev->release = zynqmp_r5_release;
> > + dev->of_node = node;
> > + dev_set_name(dev, "%pOF", node);
> > + dev_set_drvdata(dev, pdata);
> > + ret = device_register(dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error;
>
> Somehow I missed this in previous reviews: why is a new device being
> created?
>
> > +
> > + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
> > + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
> NULL, sizeof(*pdata));
>
> Passing sizeof(*pdata) will cause rproc_alloc to allocate that much
> additional space and set the rproc->priv pointer to the start of this
> additional space, but you're not using this: below, you assign pdata to
> rproc->priv.
>
> I'd suggest using the space allocated by rproc_alloc, and dropping the
> kzalloc above.
>
> > + if (!rproc) {
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > + pdata->rproc = rproc;
> > + rproc->priv = pdata;
> > +
> > + /* Set up DMA mask */
> > + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error;
> > +
> > + /* Get R5 power domain node */
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "pnode-id", &pdata->pnode_id);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error;
> > +
> > + ret = r5_set_mode(pdata);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error;
> > +
> > + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "mboxes")) {
> > + ret = zynqmp_r5_setup_mbox(pdata, node);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Add R5 remoteproc */
> > + ret = rproc_add(rproc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto error;
> > +
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
>
> This isn't used anywhere (and doesn't seem to make sense, since it will
> either point at the only rproc (for lockstep) or the second rproc
> (split)).
>
> > + return 0;
> > +error:
> > + if (pdata->rproc)
> > + rproc_free(pdata->rproc);
> > + pdata->rproc = NULL;
> > + if (dev)
> > + device_unregister(dev);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + int ret, i;
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct device_node *nc;
> > +
> > + rpu_mode = of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "lockstep-mode")
> ?
> > + PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP : PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "RPU configuration: %s\n",
> > + rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP ? "lockstep" :
> "split");
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * if 2 RPUs provided but one is lockstep, then we have an
> > + * invalid configuration.
> > + */
> > + i = of_get_available_child_count(dev->of_node);
> > + if ((rpu_mode == PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP && i != 1) || i >
> MAX_RPROCS)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + i = 0;
> > + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev->of_node, nc) {
> > + /* only call zynqmp_r5_probe if proper # of rpu's */
> > + ret = (i < MAX_RPROCS) ? zynqmp_r5_probe(rpus[i], pdev, nc)
> :
> > + -EINVAL;
>
> It looks like you want to store the allocated zynqmp_r5_pdata instance
> in rpus[i], but that's not happening here... So, rpus[i] will _always_
> be NULL, and the cleanup in zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove will never
> happen.
>
> The conditional here isn't necessary either, as you've already checked
> the number of child nodes above.
>
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "%s to probe rpu %pOF\n",
> > + ret ? "Failed" : "Able",
> > + nc);
> > +
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + i++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < MAX_RPROCS; i++) {
> > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > + struct zynqmp_r5_pdata *pdata = rpus[i];
> > +
> > + if (!pdata)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + rproc = pdata->rproc;
> > + if (rproc) {
> > + rproc_del(rproc);
> > + rproc_free(rproc);
> > + pdata->rproc = NULL;
> > + }
> > + if (pdata->tx_chan) {
> > + mbox_free_channel(pdata->tx_chan);
> > + pdata->tx_chan = NULL;
> > + }
> > + if (pdata->rx_chan) {
> > + mbox_free_channel(pdata->rx_chan);
> > + pdata->rx_chan = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + device_unregister(&pdev->dev);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove looks like it performs many of the same
> operations as zynqmp_r5_release. This duplication look incorrect: the
> appropriate cleanup should really be done in only one place.
>
> > +
> > +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
> > +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc", },
>
> This used to be "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc-1.0"; in the binding patch,
> the example still shows "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc-1.0", but the
> documentation for "compatible" shows "xlnx,zynqmp-r5-remoteproc".
>
> Which one should it be?
>
> > + { /* end of list */ },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> > + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> > + .remove = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_remove,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> > + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@xilinx.com>");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Michael

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-02 21:09    [W:0.096 / U:0.712 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site