[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH] spmi: prefix spmi bus device names with "spmi"
Quoting Mark Brown (2020-10-02 11:04:30)
> On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 10:48:32AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Mark Brown (2020-10-02 09:03:24)
> > > ...and doing this in the dev_name() should help other diagnostic users
> > > (like dev_printk() for example).
> > Don't thinks like dev_printk() prefix the bus name? See
> > dev_driver_string()? So I agree that having the bus name is useful, but
> > confused why there are testing scripts and things on top of regmap
> > debugfs
> Not that I've ever noticed, eg on the console.

I see things like this on my console:

[ 1.684617] spmi spmi-0: PMIC arbiter version v5 (0x50000000)

and 'spmi' is the bus name I'm thinking about. But I think that's
because there isn't a driver attached. Nothing prints for the 0-00
device by default, so I enabled the debug print for it and I see

[ 1.693280] pmic-spmi 0-00: 28: unknown v2.0

Anyway, the device name was written to follow i2c as far as I can tell.

If scripts, i.e. computers, have a hard time figuring out the name of
the device then fix the script?

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-02 23:40    [W:0.047 / U:0.940 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site