lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC PKS/PMEM 48/58] drivers/md: Utilize new kmap_thread()
From
Date
On 2020/10/12 13:28, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:20:34AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>> On 2020/10/10 03:50, ira.weiny@intel.com wrote:
>>> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
>>>
>>> These kmap() calls are localized to a single thread. To avoid the over
>>> head of global PKRS updates use the new kmap_thread() call.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Ira,
>>
>> There were a number of options considered.
>>
>> 1) Attempt to change all the thread local kmap() calls to kmap_atomic()
>> 2) Introduce a flags parameter to kmap() to indicate if the mapping
>> should be global or not
>> 3) Change ~20-30 call sites to 'kmap_global()' to indicate that they
>> require a global mapping of the pages
>> 4) Change ~209 call sites to 'kmap_thread()' to indicate that the
>> mapping is to be used within that thread of execution only
>>
>>
>> I copied the above information from patch 00/58 to this message. The
>> idea behind kmap_thread() is fine to me, but as you said the new api is
>> very easy to be missed in new code (even for me). I would like to be
>> supportive to option 2) introduce a flag to kmap(), then we won't forget
>> the new thread-localized kmap method, and people won't ask why a
>> _thread() function is called but no kthread created.
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> I'm going to hold off making any changes until others weigh in. FWIW, I kind
> of like option 2 as well. But there is already kmap_atomic() so it seemed like
> kmap_XXXX() was more in line with the current API.

I understand it now, the idea is fine to me.

Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>

Thanks.

Coly Li

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-10-12 09:42    [W:0.116 / U:1.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site