[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/21] KVM: Dirty ring interface
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:59:50AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 09:57:08AM -0500, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Branch is here:
> > (based on kvm/queue)
> >
> > Please refer to either the previous cover letters, or documentation
> > update in patch 12 for the big picture.
> I would rather you pasted it here. There's no way to respond otherwise.

Sure, will do in the next post.

> For something that's presumably an optimization, isn't there
> some kind of testing that can be done to show the benefits?
> What kind of gain was observed?

Since the interface seems to settle soon, maybe it's time to work on
the QEMU part so I can give some number. It would be interesting to
know the curves between dirty logging and dirty ring even for some
small vms that have some workloads inside.

> I know it's mostly relevant for huge VMs, but OTOH these
> probably use huge pages.

Yes huge VMs could benefit more, especially if the dirty rate is not
that high, I believe. Though, could you elaborate on why huge pages
are special here?


Peter Xu

 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-09 17:18    [W:0.211 / U:1.348 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site