lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] make generic-adc-thermal less noisy
From
Date
On 08/01/2020 00:20, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> I want to use generic-adc-thermal on the 32-bit Amlogic SoCs in the
> future. These have a thermal sensors which can be read through the
> SAR ADC (for which we have an IIO driver) on those SoCs.
>
> While testing I found the generic-adc-thermal driver to be a bit
> noisy when operating in well supported environment:
> - the SoC temperature sensor on the 32-bit Amlogic SoCs is typically
> loaded late because of it's dependencies (it needs data from the
> eFuse and a syscon to calibrate). Yet I still got a message stating
> there's no lookup table for the generic-adc-thermal defined (which
> is expected and perfectly valid on these Amlogic SoCs, as the IIO
> channel returns the temperature).
> - the IIO channel is correctly defined with type IIO_TEMP, yet the
> generic-adc-thermal driver still prints a message which first lead
> me to believe that I passed an incorrect IIO channel (one that
> returns a voltage).
>
>
> Martin Blumenstingl (2):
> thermal: generic-adc: silence "no lookup table" on deferred probe
> thermal: generic-adc: silence info message for IIO_TEMP channels
>
> drivers/thermal/thermal-generic-adc.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks

--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-09 23:44    [W:0.028 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site