Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] make generic-adc-thermal less noisy | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Date | Thu, 9 Jan 2020 23:43:20 +0100 |
| |
On 08/01/2020 00:20, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > I want to use generic-adc-thermal on the 32-bit Amlogic SoCs in the > future. These have a thermal sensors which can be read through the > SAR ADC (for which we have an IIO driver) on those SoCs. > > While testing I found the generic-adc-thermal driver to be a bit > noisy when operating in well supported environment: > - the SoC temperature sensor on the 32-bit Amlogic SoCs is typically > loaded late because of it's dependencies (it needs data from the > eFuse and a syscon to calibrate). Yet I still got a message stating > there's no lookup table for the generic-adc-thermal defined (which > is expected and perfectly valid on these Amlogic SoCs, as the IIO > channel returns the temperature). > - the IIO channel is correctly defined with type IIO_TEMP, yet the > generic-adc-thermal driver still prints a message which first lead > me to believe that I passed an incorrect IIO channel (one that > returns a voltage). > > > Martin Blumenstingl (2): > thermal: generic-adc: silence "no lookup table" on deferred probe > thermal: generic-adc: silence info message for IIO_TEMP channels > > drivers/thermal/thermal-generic-adc.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
|  |