lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] clone3: allow spawning processes into cgroups
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 05:01:02PM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 07:15:03AM +0100, Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > This adds support for creating a process in a different cgroup than its
> > parent.
> Binding fork and migration together looks useful.
>
> > --- a/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> > +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c
> > @@ -5882,21 +5882,176 @@ void cgroup_fork(struct task_struct *child)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&child->cg_list);
> Just a nitpick, I noticed the comment for cgroup_fork should be updated
> too (generic migration happens in cgroup_post_fork).

Thanks.

>
> > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > [...]
> > @@ -2279,8 +2278,7 @@ static __latent_entropy struct task_struct *copy_process(
> > write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> >
> > proc_fork_connector(p);
> > - cgroup_post_fork(p);
> > - cgroup_threadgroup_change_end(current);
> > + cgroup_post_fork(current, p, args);
> I can see that when CLONE_INTO_CGROUP | CLONE_NEWCGROUP is passed, then
> the child's cgroup NS will be rooted at parent's css set
> (copy_namespaces precedes cgroup_post_fork).
>
> Wouldn't it make better sense if this flags combination resulted in
> child's NS rooted in its css set?

I need to take a closer look but it sounds like we should move the
copying of the cgroup namespace to a later point; but again I need to
look into this.

Thanks!
Christian

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-08 19:13    [W:0.055 / U:0.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site