Messages in this thread |  | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ata: ahci_brcm: Follow-up changes for BCM7216 | From | Philipp Zabel <> | Date | Wed, 08 Jan 2020 10:25:03 +0100 |
| |
Hi Florian,
On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 10:30 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi Jens, Philipp, > > These three patches are a follow-up to my previous series titled: ata: > ahci_brcm: Fixes and new device support. > > After submitting the BCM7216 RESCAL reset driver, Philipp the reset > controller maintained indicated that the reset line should be self > de-asserting and so reset_control_reset() should be used instead. > > These three patches update the driver in that regard. It would be great if > you could apply those and get them queued up for 5.6 since they are > directly related to the previous series. > > Changes in v3: > - introduced a preliminary patch making use of the proper reset control > API in order to manage the optional reset controller line > - updated patches after introducing that preliminary patch
The third patch could be simplified by storing the rescal reset control in a separate struct member and relying on the optional reset control API more. This is just a suggestion though, the series looks fine as-is.
Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
regards Philipp
|  |