[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/3] ata: ahci_brcm: Follow-up changes for BCM7216
Hi Florian,

On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 10:30 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Jens, Philipp,
> These three patches are a follow-up to my previous series titled: ata:
> ahci_brcm: Fixes and new device support.
> After submitting the BCM7216 RESCAL reset driver, Philipp the reset
> controller maintained indicated that the reset line should be self
> de-asserting and so reset_control_reset() should be used instead.
> These three patches update the driver in that regard. It would be great if
> you could apply those and get them queued up for 5.6 since they are
> directly related to the previous series.
> Changes in v3:
> - introduced a preliminary patch making use of the proper reset control
> API in order to manage the optional reset controller line
> - updated patches after introducing that preliminary patch

The third patch could be simplified by storing the rescal reset control
in a separate struct member and relying on the optional reset control
API more. This is just a suggestion though, the series looks fine as-is.

Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <>


 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-08 10:25    [W:0.065 / U:0.508 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site