lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2020]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1] ASoC: rt5640: Fix NULL dereference on module unload
From
Date
03.01.2020 03:54, Mark Brown пишет:
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 06:57:14PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 31.12.2019 03:17, Mark Brown пишет:
>
>>> Please think hard before including complete backtraces in upstream
>>> reports, they are very large and contain almost no useful information
>>> relative to their size so often obscure the relevant content in your
>>> message. If part of the backtrace is usefully illustrative then it's
>>> usually better to pull out the relevant sections.
>
>> Yeah, perhaps it's not really useful to have backtrace in the commit's
>> description for the case of this patch in particular. But in general it
>> is very useful to have backtraces somewhere near the patch such that
>> online search engines, like google, could pick it up. I'll move the
>> backtrace below --- in v2, thanks.
>
> Right, this is more directed at just pasting in the entire
> backtrace (which can be huge with lots of generic bits before the
> small number that are relevant) but some edited highlights can
> definitely be helpful for search engines and for explaining the
> problem. I'll modify what I'm saying there to clarify this.

Thank you for the clarification.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2020-01-04 01:37    [W:0.071 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site